The court considered a petition for anticipatory bail. As petitioners had joined the investigation, the previously passed order was made absolute.
The order dated 05.05.2010 granting anticipatory bail was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 13077 of 2010 Date of decision: 22.07.2010
Gurkirpal Singh and another
........ Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Ms Gagandeep Grewal, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
This is a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No. 367 dated 13.12.2009 under Sections 452, 323, 380, 427, 34 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station City, Sangrur, District Sangrur.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from HC Shiv Ram, states that the petitioners have since joined the investigation.
In view of the above, the order dated 05.05.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
22.07.2010 mohan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to make the order granting anticipatory bail absolute in light of the petitioners joining the investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gurkirpal Singh and another
State of Punjab
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
