The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.PC for quashing an FIR based on a compromise. The complainant stated he was not ready to compromise. No hearing was conducted; the petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the petition, which was accordingly dismissed.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc.No.M 11240 of 2010(O&M) #1#
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH .
Crl. Misc.No.M 11240 of 2010(O&M)
Date of Decision:-25.10.2010
. Tara Singh
...... Petitioner .
Versus
. State of Punjab & Another
. ...... Respondents
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH .
Present:Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG Punjab.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for Respondent no.2.
JASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL)
Crl. Misc.No.20145 of 2010
Allowed as prayed for.
Crl. Misc.No.M 11240 of 2010
Prayer is under Section 482 Cr.PC for quashing of FIR No.28 dated 20.3.2010 under Sections 452, 323, 324 and 34 of Indian Penal Code registered with Police Station Sadar, Kapurthala on the basis of compromise(P2).
#2#
Crl. Misc.No.M 11240 of 2010(O&M)
Complainant-Phuman Singh is present in the court and has been identified by his counsel. He submits that he is not ready to compromise the matter.
After arguing for some time learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE
25th October, 2010 Vinay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for quashing of FIR under Section 482 Cr.PC can be withdrawn at the petitioner's instance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tara Singh
State of Punjab
JASWANT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
