The petitioner, having been acquitted by the trial court, made the present petition infructuous. The petition was dismissed accordingly without any substantive reasoning or discussion of legal principles.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 10214 of 2009 Date of decision: 13.10.2010
Khatija
........ Petitioner
Versus
Anisha and another .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Sarfraz Hussain, Advocate for respondent No. 1
Ms Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the respondent - State
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has
since been acquitted by the trial court, the present petition is rendered as infructuous.
Dismissed as such.
October 13, 2010 mohan
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
Khatija
Anisha
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
