This order directed the maintenance of status quo until the disposal of the suit, noting the petitioners are Dholidars and property involves Pun Arth.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
C.R.No.57 of 2009
Date of Decision : 22.9.2010
Jasvinder Singh and others
....Petitioners
Versus
Harphool Singh and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present : Mr.Deepak Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.Akshay Bhan, Advocate with Mr.Santosh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1.
MAHESH GROVER, J.
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and noticing the fact that the petitioners are Dholidars, and the documents also prima facie reveal that the property in question was given for Pun Arth , the parties are directed to maintain status quo till the disposal of the suit.
Petition stands disposed of.
22.9.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE
dss
Jasvinder Singh and others
Harphool Singh and others
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
