The Hon'ble High Court at Chandigarh dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn by the petitioner after the matter was compromised between the parties.
Petitioner granted permission to withdraw; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.5403 of 2008 Date of decision:13.01.2010
Amrik Singh
.......Petitioner
versus
Harjit Singh .....Respondent
Coram:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL.
Present: Mr.Rishabh Jain, Advocate for Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
L. N. MITTAL, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant revision petition stating that the matter has since
been compromised between the parties.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( L. N. MITTAL ) JUDGE
13.01.2010 A.Kaundal
Amrik Singh
Harjit Singh
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
