The High Court dispensed with recording reasons and dismissed the revision petition on the petitioners' application to withdraw the petition without prejudice to their existing civil suit challenging the impugned decree. The order is a brief procedural disposal with no substantive legal ratio.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.5403 of 2009 (O & M) Date of decision:12.01.2010
Satpal and others
.......Petitioners
versus
Smt. Sawaran Devi and others .....Respondents
Coram:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL.
Present: Mr.Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Sumeet Goel, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 7.
L. N. MITTAL, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing for sometime seeks permission to withdraw the instant revision petition without prejudice to the civil suit already filed by the petitioners to
challenge the preliminary decree in question.
Dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for.
( L. N. MITTAL ) JUDGE
12.01.2010 A.Kaundal
Satpal and others
Smt. Sawaran Devi and others
L. N. MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
