Shri Jainendra Gurukul v. Asha Rani
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court held Civil Revision No.5356 of 2009 infructuous after respondent bank accepted deposited amount and issued no dues certificate.
High Court held Civil Revision No.5356 of 2009 infructuous after respondent bank accepted deposited amount and issued no dues certificate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision NO.5356 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 21, 2010
Piara Singh & another
.... Petitioners
Versus
State Bank of India
.... Respondent
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL.
PRESENT: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. S. C. Pathela, Advocate for the respondent.
L.N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioners have deposited requisite amount with respondent-decree holder by calculating future interest @ 6 % per annum from the date of decree of the trial Court, as per calculation provided by the counsel for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the respondent after seeking telephonic instruction from the respondent, states that the respondent has accepted the aforesaid amount in full and final satisfaction of the respondent's claim and has issued 'no dues certificate' to the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid, the instant revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE
21.12.2010 'raj'
Piara Singh & another
State Bank of India
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court