Gola Singh v. Paras Ram and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
No.3349 of 2009(O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT…
No.3349 of 2009(O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Civil Revision No.3349 of 2009(O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.3349 of 2009(O & M) Date of Decision:15.09.2010
Gola Singh
.... petitioner
Versus
Paras Ram & Ors.
.....respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr.H.S.Rakhra,Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.Sunil Sharma, Advocate for Mr.Amit Jain, Advocate for the respondents
RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL):
Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present revision petition is covered by a judgment of this Court passed in Civil Revision No.2974 of 2009 decided on 16.11.2009.
This revision petition is allowed in the same terms and conditions. The impugned order is set aside subject to payment of costs of Rs.50,000/- to the contesting respondents, which shall be a condition precedent. The suit is ordered to be restored to its original number.
Let the parties appear before the trial Court on the date fixed and within 15 days from that date the petitioner shall pay the costs to
Civil Revision No.3349 of 2009(O & M)
2
the contesting respondents and thereafter the suit shall proceed further in
accordance with the order passed by this Court.
Disposed of.
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
15.09.2010
neenu
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Civil Revision No.2974 of 2009Referred¶14
Gola Singh
Paras Ram & Ors.
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court