Absent substantive reasoning or a specific legal proposition beyond the withdrawal of a civil revision petition, this judgment has no general applicability for characterization.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.5901 of 2010(O & M) Date of Decision:14.09.2010
Vijay Pal
.... petitioner
Versus
M/s India Lease Development Ltd., New Delhi & anr.
.....respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr.J.S.Hooda,Advocate for the petitioner
RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL):
After arguing some time, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to seek any other appropriate remedy for redressal of his grievance in accordance with law.
With aforesaid liberty, this revision petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
14.09.2010
neenu
Vijay Pal
M/s India Lease Development Ltd.
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
