The court dismissed a commercial suit petition as it had become infructuous due to an amicable settlement and relinquishment of possession by the parties.
Petition dismissed as not pressed; C.M. allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No. 169 of 2004 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 20.12.2010
Pawan Kumar Singla
.... Petitioner
Versus
Prabhjot Singh
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH
Present : Mr. Jagdev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner
ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL)
C.M. No. 32021-CII of 2010
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that parties have entered into amicable settlement and shop in question has been vacated and possession thereof has already been handed over to Smt. Jasbir Kaur widow of Prabhjot Singh, hence, present petition has rendered infructuous and same may be dismissed as not pressed.
C.M. is allowed.
Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(ALOK SINGH) JUDGE
reena
20.12.2010
Pawan Kumar Singla
Prabhjot Singh
ALOK SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
