A contempt petition was dismissed because the sole contemner, respondent No.2, died on 25.02.2010, rendering the petition non-survivable.
Contempt petition dismissed due to death of the sole contemner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1225 of 2006 Date of Decision:09.09.2010
Gurmeet Kaur & anr.
.... petitioners
Versus
Smt.Saroj Aggarwal & anr.
.....respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: None for the petitioners
None for respondent No.1
Mr.J.S.Gill, Advocate for respondent No.2
RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL):
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 states that he has died on 25.02.2010. Vide order dated 21.08.2007, this COCP was admitted only qua respondent No.2. Since the sole contemner has died, this contempt petition does not survive.
Dismissed.
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
09.09.2010
neenu
Gurmeet Kaur & anr.
Smt.Saroj Aggarwal & anr.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
