In this appeal covered by RFA No.1881 of 2000 (Labh Singh case), the Court disposed of the appeal on oral grounds following the precedent established in the previous decision.
Appeal disposed following the decision in RFA No.1881 of 2000.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.5365 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: 22.05.2009
Rajinder Singh and others
. . . . Appellants
VS.
The Collector, Land Acquisition, Industries Department, Punjab, Chandigarh and another
. . . . Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr.S.K. Singla, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr.N.S. Pawar, Addl. A.G. Punjab for the respondents.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J.(ORAL)
Both the parties are ad idem that the present appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in RFA No.1881 of 2000 titled as “Labh Singh (dead) through his LRs Major Singh and another Vs. The Collector, Land Acquisition and another” decided on 25.8.2008.
In view of the above, the present appeal is also disposed of in terms of the decision rendered RFA No.1881 of 2000 titled as “Labh Singh (dead) through his LRs Major Singh and another Vs. The Collector, Land Acquisition and another” decided on 25.8.2008.
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
MAY 22, 2009 vivek
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Labh Singh (dead) through his LRs Major Singh and another Vs. The Collector, Land Acquisition and anotherReferred¶17
RFA No.1881 of 2000 titled as Labh Singh (dead) through his LRs Major Singh and another Vs. The Collector, Land Acquisition and another decided on 25.8.2008
Rajinder Singh and others
The Collector, Land Acquisition, Industries Department, Punjab, Chandigarh and another
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
