The Court disposed of the Regular Fresh Appeal (RFA) No.337 of 1999 by holding that the matter was squarely covered by two previous decisions of the same Court rendered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Viney Mittal.
The present application and main appeal are disposed of in terms of the orders passed in RFA No.2748 of 1998 and RFA No.582 of 1999.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No.337 of 1999
-1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM No.7116-CI of 2009 RFA No.337 of 1999 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 25.5.2009
Milkhi Ram
...Appellant.
Vs.
P.S.E.B.Patiala and another
...Respondents.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr.Dharampal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.S.K.Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.(ORAL)
CM No.7116-CI of 2009
Notice in the application was issued.
Sh.S.K.Gupta, counsel for respondent No.1 has stated at the bar that the present appeal is covered by the decision of this Court rendered in RFA No.2748 of 1998 decided on 26.4.2006 and RFA No.582 of 1999 decided on 29.9.2006.
In view of the above statement, the present application is allowed.
Main appeal
Heard.
With the consent of both the parties, the main appeal is taken on Board for regular hearing.
Both the parties are ad idem that the present appeal is squarely
RFA No.337 of 1999 -2 -
covered by the decision of this Court rendered in RFA No.2748 of 1998 titled as Surjit Singh and others Vs. Punjab State and others decided by Hon'ble Mr.Justice Viney Mittal on 26.4.2006 and RFA No.582 of 1999 titled as Milkhi Ram and others Vs. PSEB Patiala and others decided by Hon'ble Mr.Justice Viney Mittal on 29.9.2006.
In view of the aforesaid statement, the present appeal is also disposed of in terms of the order passed in RFA No.2748 of 1998 titled as Surjit Singh and others Vs. Punjab State and others decided by Hon'ble Mr.Justice Viney Mittal on 26.4.2006 and RFA No.582 of 1999 titled as Milkhi Ram and others Vs. PSEB Patiala and others decided by Hon'ble Mr.Justice Viney Mittal on 29.9.2006.
25.5.2009 Meenu
(Rakesh Kumar Jain) Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Surjit Singh and others Vs. Punjab State and othersReferred¶16
RFA No.2748 of 1998 decided on 26.4.2006
Milkhi Ram and others Vs. PSEB Patiala and othersReferred¶16
RFA No.582 of 1999 decided on 29.9.2006
Milkhi Ram
P.S.E.B. Patiala
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
