Ut Chd v. Pal Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal disposed by relying on a previously decided covered matter, allowing the cross objection in identical terms without separate reasoning.
What did the court decide?
Instant appeal disposed in same terms as the referred regular first appeal; cross objection allowed.
What the court decided
C M No. 8965 CI of 2009 in/and RFA No. 1452 of 2005
-.-
Present: None for the applicant/appellants
Mr. P C Dhiman, Advocate for the non applicant/respondent.
-.-
Union Territory chandigarh v. Pal Singh
C M No. 8965 CI of 2009
Notice in the application was issued for earlier hearing of the case being a covered matter by the decision of this Court rendered in Regular First Appeal No. 4238 of 2006 titled as ' Mrs. Avtar Sachdev and others v. Union Territory, Chandigarh' , decided on 02.04.2009.
Learned counsel for the respondent/objector states that the case is duly covered with the aforesaid Regular First Appeal.
In view of the application, the main appeal is being taken for final disposal today.
Application stands disposed of.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the instant appeal requires independent adjudication or can be concluded by reference to a covered regular first appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Union Territory Chandigarh
- respondent
Pal Singh
Coram
Nirmaljit Kaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/1452/2005
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court