The High Court disposed of the State's appeal against a Single Judge order substituting dismissal with compulsory retirement for an erstwhile constable. The Court held that no interference was called for given the long lapse of time and dismissing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
LPA No.511 of 1999 (O&M) Date of decision: 3.11.2009
State of Haryana and others
-----Appellants
Vs.
Ex –Constable Ram Kumar
----Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH
Present:- Mr. Rameshwar Malik, Addl.Advocate General, Haryana for the appellants.
Adarsh Kumar Goel ,J.
LPA No.511 of 1999 (O&M)
2
from duty from 5.5.1992 to 31.7.1992. After enquiry, the charge was held to have been established and order of dismissal from service was passed, which was confirmed in appeal.
order passed by learned Single Judge.
this stage.
(Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge
November 03, 2009 (Gurdev Singh) ‘gs’ Judge
LPA No.511 of 1999 (O&M) 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Single Judge order substituting dismissal with compulsory retirement despite the delay in pension payment.
Whether the State's appeal against the substitution of punishment can be entertained after a delay of more than ten years.
State of Haryana and others
Ex – Constable Ram Kumar
Adarsh Kumar Goel
Gurdev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
