The Single Judge held the ESI Corporation's appeal as passed infructuous observing that the respondent paid the damages subsequently rendered the appeal infructuous.
The appeal stands dismissed as it is rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FAO No. 769 of 1986 (O&M)
In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
Employees State Insurance Corporation
... Appellant
vs
Amritsar Swadeshi Woolen Mills
.... Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. B. S. Bhalla, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Jai Shree Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Learned counsel for the appellant on instructions from Inspector Mohindera Taneja submitted that after the matter was remitted by the ESI Court for reconsideration, the respondent establishment has already paid the damages which was levied subsequently.
In view of the aforesaid development, the present appeal has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
14.12.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge
Employees State Insurance Corporation
Amritsar Swadeshi Woolen Mills
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
