Disposed
Gurcharan Singh v. P.S.E.B. and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/5406/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner's writ petition was withdrawn. This order is without precedent value.
What the court decided
AI extract
The petitioner's writ petition was withdrawn. This order is without precedent value.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 5406 of 2009
DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 16, 2009
Gurcharan Singh Pannu
.....PETITIONER
Versus
The Punjab State Electricity Board, The Mall, Patiala and another
....RESPONDENTS
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Sarjit Singh, Sr. Advocate, with Mr.Jagdev Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner
states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
April 16, 2009 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE
Gurcharan Singh Pannu
The Punjab State Electricity Board
Satish Kumar Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court