CWP withdrawn by petitioners with liberty to file a fresh petition. The High Court dismissed the petition with the said liberty.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. No. 5347 of 2009
DATE OF DECISION : 02.04.2009
Jugesh Devi and others
.... PETITIONERS
Versus
The State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Girish Agnihotri, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Binayjeet Sheoran and Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Advocates, for the petitioners.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
Counsel for the petitioners states that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
April 02, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE
Jugesh Devi and others
The State of Haryana and others
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
