The High Court disposed of the writ petition, observing that benefits due to riot victims should be extended to the petitioner if she qualifies under the law.
Petition disposed with observation that benefits may be extended if petitioner qualifies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 4902 of 2007 Date of Decision: 20.01.2009
Gurmit Kaur
..Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.THAKUR,CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Present : Mr. Vikram Bali, Advocate for Mr. P.S.Baath, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms. Madhu Dayal, Addl. A.G. Punjab
Mr. M.K.Dogra, Advocate
Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate for GAMADA.
T.S.Thakur, C.J. (Oral)
In the light of the order passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 7612 of 2003, this petition is disposed off with the observation that the benefits due to the riot victims may be extended to the petitioner also if she otherwise qualifies for the grant of such benefits.
(T.S.THAKUR) CHIEF JUSTICE
(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE
20.01.2009 'ravinder'
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for extension of riot victim benefits given a prior order.
If the petitioner qualifies for benefits, whether they should be extended despite her riot victim status.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
CWP No. 7612 of 2003Followed¶15
Gurmit Kaur
State of Punjab
T.S. Thakur
Hemant Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
