Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition which was admitted as withdrawn with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH.
*******
CWP NO. 1857 OF 2009 Date of Decision: February 05, 2009
Baldev Raj
Versus The State of Haryana and others.
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S.Thakur, CJ and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta.
Present: Shri Satbir Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.
T.S.Thakur, CJ (Oral)
After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(T.S.Thakur) Chief Justice
(Hemant Gupta) Judge
February 05, 2009 Malik
Baldev Raj
The State of Haryana
T.S. Thakur
Hemant Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
