The High Court of Punjab and Haryana adjourned the writ petition as infructuous due to a settlement proposal under active consideration, permitting revival if no settlement is reached.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous due to pending settlement negotiations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.17414 of 2007 Date of decision:06.08.2009.
M/s J.S. Kundlas Rice Mills and others
..Petitioners
Versus
Specified Authority and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
Present: Mr. I.S.Ratta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. H.S.Lalli, Advocate, for the respondents.
JASBIR SINGH, J. (ORAL).
Counsel for the parties are in agreement that proposal, for one time settlement, made by the petitioners, to the Corporation, is under active consideration and is likely to be materialized.
In view of above, this writ petition has become infructuous.
However, it is made clear that in case one time settlement
is not arrived at between the parties, the petitioners may move an application to get this writ petition revived.
Disposed of.
August 06, 2009. ( JASBIR SINGH ) vinod* JUDGE
M/s J.S. Kundlas Rice Mills and others
Specified Authority and others
Jasbir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
