High Court disposed of a civil writ petition as infructuous because the departmental proceedings against the petitioner had been dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.14087 of 1993 Date of Decision: December 02, 2009
Ashok Kumar Malhotra
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. R.S. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petition has been rendered infructuous, in so much as, departmental proceedings that had been initiated, have since been dropped.
The petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(AJAI LAMBA)
December 02, 2009 JUDGE
avin
Ashok Kumar Malhotra
State of Punjab
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
