Public interest litigation withdrawal allowed with liberty to file independent petition for individual right enforcement by Chief Justice Thakur.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file independent writ petition for enforcement of own rights.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 13472 of 2007 Date of Decision: 14.1.2009
Lehna Singh and another
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Present: Shri Ajay Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Shri Rameshwar Malik, Additional AG, Haryana, for respondent No. 1.
Shri S.C. Sibal, Senior Advocate, with Shri V.S. Rana, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.
T.S. Thakur, C.J. (Oral).
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition, reserving liberty for the petitioners to file an independent writ petition for enforcement of their own right, instead of a petition filed in public interest.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(T.S. THAKUR) CHIEF JUSTICE
(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE
14-01-2009 ds
Lehna Singh
another
State of Haryana
others
T.S. THAKUR
HEMANT GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
