Commission against the cadre of Assistant District Attorney and in the Cadre of selection of Civil Judges, the process of which is being undertaken by the High Court. At any rate , there is no constitutional obligation for the High Court to undertake the selections of Assistant District Attorneys in the State. It was next contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the process of selection is not over and that since the members conducted the selection having been appointed by the government in power, the said process will be vitiated by extraneous consideration. We find no merit in that contention. Whether or not there is any illegality or irregularity in the selection process, is a matter which can be examined by the Court at the instance of any candidate who may have applied for selection. The petitioner obviously is not one of the candidates. He has already retired as a District Attorney and is now practicing as an Advocate at Chandigarh. He has therefore no locus standi to question the validity of the selection process. That apart, the question whether the selection process undertaken by four members of the Commission will suffer from any illegality is also a matter that can be raised and examined at an appropriate level at the instance of proceedings filed by a candidate. We see no reason to undertake that process at the instance of a person who is obviously not process of selection. His only concern is for making the selection pure and unaffected by extraneous consideration. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is dismissed. No costs.
