In an oral order, the court reduced the petitioner's claim to issue directions to respondent No. 3 regarding a representation filed by the petitioner to decide it within 15 days.
Directions to respondent No. 3 to decide the petitioner's representation within 15 days from the date of receipt of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 12192 OF 2009
DATE OF DECISION : August 12, 2009.
Parties Name
Kanta Devi
...PETITIONER
VERSUS State of Punjab and others
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
PRESENT: Mr.Divjyot S. Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.
JASBIR SINGH, J. (oral)
ORDER:
Counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No. 3 to decide representation, filed by the petitioner, on March 6, 2009 (P-5).
This writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No. 3 to take note and decide the aforesaid representation, as per law, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. While deciding that representation, the authority concerned may notice the provisions of Section 28 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969.
( Jasbir Singh ) Judge
August 12, 2009. DKC
1 issue framed by the court
Whether representation filed by the petitioner should be decided by respondent No. 3.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kanta Devi
State of Punjab and others
JASBIR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
