Pardeep Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

The petitioner is working as Safai Karamchari in Market Committee, Sunam, since 5.11.1975. His case is that he belongs to Scheduled Caste category and as such is entitled to be considered for promotion against 20% quota for promotion to the post of Clerk amongst Class-IV employees. It is the case of the petitioner that he is fully eligible to be considered for the said promotion, but the respondents are not considering his claim. It is stated that in this regard, the petitioner has made representation dated 27.1.2009 to respondent No.2, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure P-2, but the same has not been considered and decided so far. Counsel for the petitioner states that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied, if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to

¶14

CWP No. 12101 of 2009

¶15

-2-

¶16

consider and decide the aforesaid representation, expeditiously.

¶17

In view of the above, without issuing notice of motion as it will un-necessary delay the matter, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation dated 27.1.2009 (Annexure P-2) expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months.

¶18

August 12, 2009 ndj

¶19

( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE

Pardeep Kumar v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pardeep Kumar v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Shiv Shakti Exports and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sanjiv Kumar and Ors. Vs Hy.St. and ORS.(MAIN6)

Shashi Sharma etc. Vs State of Haryana etc. (M1)

Brij Mohan Behal Vs Kurukshetra University and Anr.

Shri Guru Singh Sabha etc. Vs State of Punjab etc.

Dharam Pal Gautam Vs Uhbvnl and Ors.