Petitioner sought directions to release his salary. Counsel requested withdrawal with liberty for alternative remedy. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. No. 11674 of 2009
DATE OF DECISION : 05.08.2009
Harpreet Singh
.... PETITIONER
Versus
The State of Punjab and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. B.S. Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
The only claim in this petition is to to issue direction to the respondents to release the salary of the petitioner, who is working as a Manager in a Co-operative Society.
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail his alternative remedy.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
August 05, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE
Harpreet Singh
The State of Punjab
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
