petitioner seems to be reasonable one. Revisionist remained in custody for sometime. He was 48 years old at the time of accident on 21.2.1996. Revisionist is to become hard criminal if sent to jail to undergo imprisonment. Revisionist belongs to a poor family and he was not a previous convict. So, keeping in view the nature of offence and antecedents of the revisionist, impugned order dated 7.2.2001 is upheld with the modification that instead of undergoing imprisonment as ordered by the trial Court, revisionist is directed to be released on probation on furnishing probation bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to keep peace and be of good behaviour for a period of one year and to pay Rs.50,000/- more,as cost of the litigation. Revisionists is to receive sentence as and when called upon, in case of breach of the conditions of the probation bonds. Rs.50,000/- if deposited by the revisionist is to be paid as compensation to the heirs of the deceased namely Sohan Singh. Probation bonds are to be furnished within two months from today before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ropar. Rs.50000/- is also to be deposited within two months with the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ropar failing which revision would stand dismissed and revisionist is to undergo imprisonment as the impugned judgment of the Ist Appellate Court.
