Petitioners, admitted to regular bail by the trial court, filed the current matter. The court held the petition infructuous and dismissed it.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to regular bail already granted by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.M. No. M- 9145 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.7.2009.
Smt. Babli and another
................ Petitioners
vs.
State of Haryana
.................Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri
Present: Sh. Abhishek Sethi, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Sh. A.K. Jindal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
K.C. Puri, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners
have been admitted to regular bail by the trial Court.
The petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
( K.C. Puri ) 24.7.2009. Judge chugh
Smt. Babli and another
State of Haryana
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
