Rohit Khanna v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to the petitioner, granted only on the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, pending trial for offences under Sections 307, 353, 186 and 34 IPC.
What did the court decide?
Bail to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalandhar.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc No. M-5407 of 2009 Date of decision : 16.04.2009
Rohit Khanna
....Petitioner
V/s
State of Punjab
....Respondent.
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. R.S. Cheema, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tanu Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab.
Mr. Sarabjit Singh, Advocate for the complainant.
RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)
This is a petition for grant of regular bail in case registered against the petitioner under Sections 307, 353, 186 and 34 IPC vide FIR No. 457 dated 11.12.2008 at police station Division No. 6, Jalandhar.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail pending trial in an offence under Sections 307, 353, 186 and 34 IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rohit Khanna
- respondent
State of Punjab
Coram
Rajan Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/5407/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court