Petitioner sought dismissal of the writ petition due to a compromise between the parties. The court accepted the submission and dismissed the petition.
Dismissal of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-40406 of 2007 (O&M)
DATE OF DECISION: 19.11.2009
Anil Sehajpal
. . . . Petitioner
VS.
State of Punjab and others
. . . . Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr.Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Ranbir Singh Rawat, AAG, Punjab.
Mr.Naveen Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as a compromise has been effected between the parties, this petition has become infructuous. Therefore, he prays for dismissal of the petition.
I order accordingly.
NOVEMBER 19, 2009 Vivek
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
Anil Sehajpal
State of Punjab and others
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
