Anil Sehajpal v. State of Punjab and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-11807 of 2008 (O&M)
DATE OF DECISION: 19.11.2009
Anil Sehajpal . . . . Petitioner
VS.
State of Punjab and another
. . . . Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr.Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Ranbir Singh Rawat, AAG, Punjab.
Mr.Naveen Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that this
matter has become infructuous as the complaint has been withdrawn.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
NOVEMBER 19, 2009 Vivek
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
Anil Sehajpal
State of Punjab
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court