The petitioner argued that the current petition has become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M 3521 of 2009 Date of decision: 16.2.2009
Ram Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL
Present: Mr.RK Bagga, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.Tarunveer Vashist, Addl.A.G., Haryana
Harbans Lal, J.(Oral)
Reply filed on behalf of the State is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this petition has
become infructuous.
In view of the statement made above, this petition is dismissed
as having become infructuous.
February 16, 2009 (Harbans Lal) gsv Judge
Ram Kumar
State of Haryana
Harbans Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
