The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one on admissions by the counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M 33827 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.2.2009
Raj Kumar and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL
Present: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr.Tarunveer Vashist, Addl.A.G., Haryana
Harbans Lal, J.(Oral)
After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh one.
In view of the statement made above, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
February 16, 2009 (Harbans Lal) gsv Judge
Raj Kumar
State of Haryana
Harbans Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
