Single judge order dismissing a criminal revision application for non-prosecution due to failure of the petitioner to supply correct address and non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR 3257 of 2009 Date of decision: 15.03.2011
Murti Devi
........ Petitioner
Versus
Prahlad Singh .......Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: None for the petitioner
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
On 25.10.2010, the matter was adjourned to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to supply correct address of the respondent within three weeks. However, no correct address was supplied. Thereafter, the matter was once again adjourned to 13.01.2011. On that date, learned counsel for the petitioner sought some more time to do the needful. As per office report, fresh notice could not be issued as correct address has not been supplied till date nor is any one present on behalf of the petitioner in Court today.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
15.03.2011 mohan
Murti Devi
Prahlad Singh
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
