Bishamber Dayal v. State of Haryana and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What did the court decide?
Order dated 4.12.2008 confirmed subject to condition of not absenting without sufficient cause.
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
Order dated 4.12.2008 confirmed subject to condition of not absenting without sufficient cause.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
-.-
Crl. Misc. No. M- 31865 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 17.3.2009
Bishamber Dayal Versus State of Haryana & Anr.
Present:- Mr. Atul Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. S.S.Goripuria, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate, for the complainant.
M.M.S.BEDI. (J) (Oral)
Petitioner has already put in appearance before the summoning Court, pursuant to the interim order.
Petition is allowed. Interim order dated 4.12.2008 is hereby confirmed subject to the condition that petitioner will not absent himself without any sufficient cause.
March 17, 2009 tripti
(M.M.S.Bedi) Judge
Bishamber Dayal
State of Haryana & Anr
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court