High Court allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition confirming an interim order. The petitioner, having joined the investigation, was granted bail subject to conditions not to tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation.
Petition allowed, interim order confirmed subject to condition of joining investigation and not tampering with evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
-.-
Crl. Misc. No. M- 1135 of 2009 Date of Decision:- 17.3.2009
Ajit Singh Versus State of Punjab
Present:- Mr. J.S.Lali, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Rajni Gupta, DAG, Punjab.
M.M.S.BEDI. (J) (Oral)
On the statement of Narvaid Singh, ASI, it has been informed that petitioner has joined investigation.
Petition is allowed. Interim order dated 15.1.2009 is hereby confirmed subject to the condition that petitioner will join investigation as and when required by the police; he will not tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation in any manner.
March 17, 2009 (M.M.S.Bedi) tripti Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, who joined investigation, should be placed under interim bail conditions.
Ajit Singh
State of Punjab
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
