The Court disposed of a special bail petition. Since the petitioner joined the investigation, the earlier order was made absolute, subject to provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
Order dated 17.9.2009 made absolute; petitioner to abide by Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh .
CRM.M-25836 of 2009 Decided on 08.10.2009.
Pawan Kumar -- Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab --Respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr.Veneet Sharma,Advocate,for the petitioner
Mr.S.S.Mattewal,Advocate, for the complainant.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact is admitted by learned counsel for the respondent/State on instructions received from Nirmal Singh, ASI.
In view of above, order dated 17.9.2009, is made absolute. The petitioner shall, however, keep on joining the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.
The petition is disposed of.
08.10.2009 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order making the petitioner's special bail application absolute in light of his joining the investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pawan Kumar
State of Punjab
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
