The petition was held infructuous as the petitioner had already been granted bail under Section 167 Cr.P.C., and was dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-24836 of 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 20.10.2009
Chanan Kaur
. . . . Petitioner
VS.
State of Punjab . . . . Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr.N.P.S. Mann, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms.Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J.(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this
petition has become infructuous as the petitioner has already granted bail under Section 167 Cr.P.C.
Dismissed as infructuous.
OCTOBER 20, 2009
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
vivek
Chanan Kaur
State of Punjab
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
