In an oral order regarding Section 438 Cr.P.C., the court, noting the petitioner's admission to joining the investigation by the State, made the anticipatory bail order absolute and disposed of the petition.
Order dated 15.7.2009 made absolute; petitioner directed to join investigation and abide by Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.33750 of 2009 and CRM M-18734 of 2009
Date of Decision: 9.9.2009
Harbans Kaur
..Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Punjab
..Respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present : Mr.A.S.Cheema, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.K.D.Sachdeva, Addl.AG Punjab for the respondent/State. None for the complainant.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (Oral)
CRM No.33750 of 2009
Allowed as prayed for.
Main Case
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact is admitted by the counsel for the State, on instructions received from HC Harjinder Singh.
In view of the above, order dated 15.7.2009 is hereby made absolute. He shall keep on joining the investigation as and when called for. He shall also abide by the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
The petition stands disposed of.
(Rakesh Kumar Jain) 9.9.2009 Judge Meenu
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the petitioner to join the investigation and make the anticipatory bail order absolute.
Whether to direct the petitioner to abide by the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harbans Kaur
State of Punjab
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
