Single judge order making an interim bail order absolute upon the petitioner stating compliance with the notice date. State absent.
Order dated 24.08.2009 admitted to be complied with is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-23219 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 21, 2009
Gurjit Singh @ Jaggi
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab … Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND
Present : Ms. Monika Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. BBS Teji, AAG, Punjab.
*******
S.D. Anand, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states at the bar that
the petitioner has entered appearance before the learned Trial Court in compliance with the order dated 24.08.2009 and has been admitted to interim bail.
Learned State counsel states that as no-one has turned up to instruct him, he is not in a position to concede or controvert that averment. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has made the averment at the bar.
In the light thereof, the order dated 24.08.2009 is
made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
October 21, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vinod Judge
Gurjit Singh @ Jaggi
State of Punjab
S.D. Anand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
