Petitioner sought relief via Criminal Misc. No. M-18957 of 2009. The petitioner was absent. The State Counsel argued the underlying conviction had already occurred, rendering the petition infructuous, leading to dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-18957 of 2009 Date of Decision:20.10.2009
Hashim
.....Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARBANS LAL
Present:None for the petitioner.
Mr. Tarunveer Vashist, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
HARBANS LAL, J.
Learned State Counsel submits that the petitioner has been
convicted on 10.9.2009 and thus, this petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
October 20, 2009 ( HARBANS LAL ) renu JUDGE
Hashim
State of Haryana
HARBANS LAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
