Single judge disposed of petitioners' bail plea. Having noted they joined investigation, the interlocutory order dated 12.06.2009 was made absolute subject to Section 438(2) conditions.
The interlocutory order dated 12.06.2009 was made absolute; petitioners to abide by Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M- 16379 of 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 15.09.2009
Sonu and another . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Haryana and another . . . . Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr.Amit Khatkar, AAG, Haryana for the State/respondent.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J.(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the State/respondent, on instructions received from HC Surinder Kumar, submits that pursuant to the order dated 12.06.2009, petitioners have joined the investigation and are no more required for custodial interrogation.
In view of the above, order dated 12.06.2009 is hereby made absolute.
It is directed that the petitioners shall abide by the conditions as envisaged by Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
Petition is disposed of.
SEPTEMBER 15, 2009 vivek
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to make the anticipatory bail order absolute given that petitioners have joined investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sonu and another
State of Haryana
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
