Petitioner's anticipatory bail application admitted to be settled via bank draft and investigation joining. Court confirmed original order made absolute with conditions to join investigation as called.
Order dated 19.5.2009 made absolute; petitioner must join investigation as called and abide by S. 438(2).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh .
CRM.M 13328 of 2009 Decided on Sept 16,2009.
Brij Bhushan
-- Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab --Respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr.S.K.Sharma,Advocate,for the petitioner Mr.K.D.Sachdeva,Addl.AG,Punjab.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- which is alleged to have been taken by him from the complainant has already been returned by way of bank draft. It is also submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact is admitted by learned counsel for the respondent/State on instructions received from Baldev Singh, ASI.
In view of above, order dated 19.5.2009, is made absolute. The petitioner shall, however, keep on joining the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.
The petition is disposed of.
Sept 16,2009 RR
(Rakesh Kumar Jain) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a no-bail order given the settlement of allegations and joining of investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Brij Bhushan
State of Punjab
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
