The Single Judge held that since the FIR was registered upon the petitioner's complaint, the petition was rendered infructuous and dismissed it accordingly.
Petition dismissed as it was rendered infructuous due to FIR registration on the petitioner's complaint.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Criminal Misc. No.M-11944 of 2009 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 19.8.2009.
Pooja Bhatt
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present:Mr. O.P. Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Sr. DAG Punjab.
Mr. Gurdev Singh Dham, Advocate.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the FIR has
been registered on the complaint of the petitioner, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
19.8.2009
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Reema
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's objection that the FIR was registered on their complaint renders the present petition infructuous is accepted.
Pooja Bhatt
State of Punjab
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
