Petitioner moved High Court filing consumer complaint; counsel stated he was acquitted; court dismissed petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM No. M-11849 of 2008 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CRM No. M-11849 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 4.5.2009
Nirdosh Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
Pacific Finlease Pvt. Ltd.
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. H.S. Saggu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sarita Sanghi, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab.
Rajan Gupta, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been acquitted in the complaint, lodged against him in the instant case. He, therefore, submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and he be allowed to withdraw the same.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
May 04, 2009 'rajpal'
Nirdosh Kumar
Pacific Finlease Pvt. Ltd.
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
