Petitioners sought withdrawal of the instant maintenance petition. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc.No.10078 M of 2008 (O & M) Date of decision: 03.02.2009
Jugraj Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL
Present: Mr. Suresh Goel, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.T.S.Salana, DAG, Punjab.
Harbans Lal, J.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the statement made above, the instant petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
February 03, 2009 amrit
(Harbans Lal) Judge
Jugraj Singh
State of Punjab
Harbans Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
