Petitioners sought to withdraw the petition. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and directed the trial court to dispose of the case within six months.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn; the trial court is directed to dispose of the case within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 164 of 2009 Date of decision: 2.2.2009
Moti and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL
Present: Ms.Preeti Khanna, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr.Tarunveer Vashist, Addl.A.G., Haryana
Harbans Lal, J.
After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that she may be permitted to withdraw the present petition and the direction may be given to the learned trial court to dispose of the case within 6 months.
In view of the statement made above, the instant petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
The learned trial court is directed to dispose of the case within 6 months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.
(Harbans Lal) Judge
February 2, 2009 gsv
Moti and Another
State of Haryana
HARBANS LAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
