Single order dismissing a revision petition filed against an interim injunction order under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.R. No. 5488 of 2003
DATE OF DECISION : 20.08.2009
Rameshwar and others
.... PETITIONERS
Versus
State of Haryana
..... RESPONDENT
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Kirti Singh, AAG, Haryana.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
This revision petition has been filed against the interim order passed under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC. Counsel for the petitioners states that during the pendency of this revision petition, main suit has been decided, therefore, this petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
August 20, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE
Rameshwar and others
State of Haryana
Satish Kumar Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
