Sultan Ram v. Vijay Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's habeas corpus petition was dismissed as withdrawn in an oral order delivered by Justice M.M.S. Bedi on November 10, 2009.
The petitioner's habeas corpus petition was dismissed as withdrawn in an oral order delivered by Justice M.M.S. Bedi on November 10, 2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.No.4129 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R.No.4129 of 2008. Decided on: November 10, 2009.
Sultan Ram
.. Petitioner
VERSUS
Vijay Kumar
.. Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI
PRESENT Mr.Aseem Kataria, Advocate, for the petitioner.
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition
has become infructuous.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(M.M.S.BEDI)
JUDGE
November 10, 2009. rka
. . . 1
Sultan Ram
Vijay Kumar
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court